The 1998 World Cup was won by the host nation, France. The leader of the British National Party, the oily-haired Nick Griffin, was a guest on the BBC's
"Question Time" last night. Those two statements might appear to be unrelated, but this week I want to discuss the significance of the French team in 1998 in relation to both football and politics, and next summer's tournament in South Africa. Stay with me on this one.
Firstly, a bit of background information about the
1998 World Cup. I love that tournament. It was the first one to take place when I was old enough to appreciate the games and, because it was being played in Europe, the kick-off times were all at reasonable hours of the day. Those weeks in the summer of 1998 saw matches being played almost always in blazing sunshine, or under floodlights on humid evenings. England went out in the second round but the game with Argentina was like a tournament in itself. So much happened:
Michael Owen's wonder strike, Javier Zanetti's infuriatingly clever equaliser to make it 2-2, David Beckham's sending-off, Sol Campbell's disallowed golden goal in extra time, Argentina missing first in the shoot-out only for Paul Ince and David Batty to miss their spot kicks too. The world seemed different at the end of that penalty shoot-out. Us young fans felt different too - somehow wiser, less innocent.
Football had been changing in the years prior to France 98 and the tournament helped the game to evolve even more. From an English perspective, the Premier League had been running for six years and, to show what effect that had had on the league, it is so easy to forget how unexpected it was in May 1998 for Arsenal to win the title under Arsene Wenger, a bespectacled French manager who looked like a village teacher. That Arsenal side still contained the members of George Graham's legendarily effective back four - Tony Adams, Steve Bould, Nigel Winterburn, and Lee Dixon - but in terms of style and tactics the team was unrecognisable from the league-winning sides of 1989 and 1991. The French national team's success in 1998 had a tactical signficance too. They played with a lone striker, Stéphane Guivarc'h, who was not there to score himself so much as to distract the opposition's defenders and create space for his teammates (including a fresh-faced Thierry Henry) to attack from deeper positions. Aimé Jacquet's system, so derided before the tournament, was vindicated when Brazil were conquered 3-0 in the final. The decline of the centre forward in the modern game has only recently been adapted to by English football. Manchester United won the Champions League in 2008 without a traditional number 9, opting instead for two deep strikers linking up with two wide players, and next year in South Africa England will in all probability line up with Emile Heskey occupying the Guivarc'h role.
Politically, however, the French team was very interesting too. If the first few years of the Premier League made English club football a more cosmopolitan place - thanks to Eric Cantona, Dennis Bergkamp, Gianfranco Zola, Juninho, Jurgen Klinsmann, and many others - then the World Cup in 1998 also refreshed the appearance of international football. France's captain, Didier Deschamps, was born in France but many of the rest of the side were not. Lilian Thuram, the elegant full back and unlikely scorer of both goals in the semi-final win over Croatia, was born in Guadeloupe in the French West Indies. Christian Karembeu's birthplace was an island territory of France in the southwest Pacific, Lifou. Patrick Vieira, then at Arsenal and a substitute in the final, famously did not move to France from Senegal until he was 8. The greatest player in the team, Zinedine Zidane, was born in Marseille to Muslim parents who had emigrated from Algeria. So, whenever France scored during the tournament, the players literally embraced one another as Frenchmen united not necessarily by birthplace, religion, or ethnicity, but a common purpose and a responsibility towards one another. They all wore blue; they were a team.
France's answer to Nick Griffin, Jean-Marie Le Pen, has in the past denounced the French national team for containing players from immigrant families and those born in the country's colonies. The president of France's National Front is clearly no football fan, for which one of us would mind if England's goalkeeper was green and had eyes on stalks if he never dropped a cross? If anything, the eyes would be a bonus. But flippancy aside, nationality is such a slippery term that trying to define it is like trying to pick up a bar of soap from the bottom of the bath water. Just when you think you've got a grip on it, you realise you haven't. Nationality only really exists in a legal sense, in terms of what it says on your passport.
Colour in football, and so too nationality, is a matter only for the difference between the shirts of the two teams, not those wearing them.
There is no reason why Manuel Almunia, Arsenal's Spanish-born keeper, could not play for England next summer if he does have UK citizenship. Any player who can, and does, put on an England shirt is, by virtue of that very act, as entitled to wear it as the man next to him in the dressing room. Owen Hargreaves' parents are English but he was born in Canada and then moved to Germany at 16 to play for Bayern Munich. He made his senior debut for England in 2001, six years before he would come to live in this country for the first time as a Manchester United player. He certainly runs around as much as an Englishman should do, when his knees let him that is, but he speaks English with a foreign accent just as Almunia does. It doesn't matter. Gabriel Agbonlahor speaks with a broad Birmingham accent but he could have represented Nigeria. He also could have played for Scotland. What the young man considers his nationality to be outside of football is entirely up to him, if it even concerns him, but when wearing the colours of England he is English and I for one relish what it says about this country that he and Wayne Rooney, that near-caricature of what the BNP think a British person should look and be like, may well be tearing through a defence on the counter-attack together next summer.